Cambridge – American cities should lower urban emissions by focusing on residential energy use. The key to this is better building practices, not greater housing density, a new study finds.
While many cities are pursuing urban densification strategies
in an effort to lower urban emissions, a new study finds that
cities will have a greater impact in the fight against climate
change if they focus on energy-efficient construction.
“You can do a lot of things at the local level to affect
housing stock that are basically equivalent or even more aggressive
than the Clean Power Plan,” said David Hsu from MIT, one of
the three co-authors of a new paper detailing the study’s findings.
The Obama administration introduced the Clean Power Plan in 2015,
but the Trump administration has announced that it intends to
repeal it.
Some residential energy use strategies will have a great
impact over others, finds the study. For instance, requiring newly
built homes to be more energy efficient would reduce residential
emissions by an average of 6 per cent by 2030. But requiring
existing homes to be retrofitted would yield a further 19 per cent
reduction of residential emission, on average, across the 11 cities
analysed in the study.
Perhaps surprisingly, there was relatively less benefit in
reducing the number of newly built single-family homes and
replacing them with multi-family buildings.
“Shifting people to multifamily buildings is what planners
have always wanted to do, but that’s actually not as effective as
most advocates would have thought,” Hsu said.
The main reason is that as new homes become more
energy-efficient, the energy-use differences between larger
single-family homes and homes in multi-family dwellings will
shrink, thus “reducing the energy and emissions benefits of any
substituting attached homes for detached ones”.